We checked-out possible variations by site, geographical part, and ethnicity having fun with t-tests and you can investigation regarding variance (ANOVA) into LIWC classification percentages. With the a few other sites, half a dozen of your own a dozen t-evaluation was high on after the categories: first-individual only 1 [t(3998) = ?5.61, p Supplementary Dining table dos to own form, simple deviations, and you may contrasts ranging from cultural organizations). Contrasts shown extreme differences when considering White and all other cultural teams when you look at the five of half a dozen significant ANOVAs. Thus, i incorporated ethnicity because an excellent dummy-coded covariate within the analyses (0 = White, step 1 = Virtually any cultural communities).
Of your own 12 ANOVA screening linked to geographical region, merely one or two have been high (family members and positive feeling). Because the variations just weren’t theoretically meaningful, i don’t think geographic area during the subsequent analyses.
Performance
Regularity off term play with goes without saying in the detailed statistics (look for Table step 1) and you may thru keyword-clouds.
